Tag: #ATF

Glock Bans – The Latest Assault Weapons Lie 

One of the latest innovative strategies from the extremists at Gun Control, Inc. is the Glock Ban. These new state laws being tested around the country target the ubiquitous Glock and Glock-style handguns because they are convertible to fully automatic by use of a “switch”. Never mind that a “switch” is highly illegal at both the state and federal level, the ban is because someone might take an illegal part and illegally put it into a legal firearm. 

Of course, this is on top of numerous states suing Glock for producing firearms that can be illegally converted in the first place for marketing their capabilities to law-abiding civilians for self-defensive purposes which apparently also appeal to criminals. That supposedly makes them liable for unlawful use by criminals. 

At issue is a small, add-on device invented by a Venezuelan man in 1986 and issued a U.S. patent in 1998. With it, a standard semi-automatic Glock handgun functions as a fully automatic Glock.  As you might expect, a so-called “Glock Switch” is considered a fully automatic firearm part and, like an auto seer for any other firearm, highly regulated and illegal to make, possess or use. 

Of course, with the U.S. Patent being filed, the genie was out of the bottle. The patent, intended to control the product and prevent others from making, selling, distributing or using it without your permission and/licensing, in effect gave it to the illegal world. Criminals, which includes other countries, care as much about patents as they do about the legal system. As such, Glock Switches began showing up in the U.S. within a few years. Many came in from China and now with the widespread adoption of 3D printing at the consumer level, they can be printed at home. 

So, what of Glock? Is this their fault for designing a firearm that can be converted to fully automatic? Of course not. Only one Glock model, the Glock 18, is fully automatic. It is only sold to the military and law enforcement and the critical parts to make it fully automatic are not compatible with any other Glock firearms by design. 

Keep in mind Glock’s striker fired design has also been replicated by many other firearm manufacturers. Note also that many semi-automatic firearms can be converted into fully automatic use by someone who knows how. The fact that these “switches” are currently only available for Glocks is no different than computer viruses targeting the most widely used software and operating systems first. You go after the biggest target first, then go after the rest later. This approach holds true for “switches” and for gun control as well. 

Now enter the extremists from Gun Control, Inc. Having been unsuccessful at banning handguns after the United States Supreme Court ruled that unconstitutional, they attempted to slip the “semi-automatic mechanism” into their ever-evolving definition of so-called “assault weapons”, thus far with only limited success.  Glock Bans allows them to go after one of the most common and widely owned semi-automatic handguns in the country/world because it can be illegally converted to fully automatic. 

I’d like to think our own ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) has only been interested in removing these illegal devices from our streets and going after those who make and distribute them, but after seeing some of the ATF bulletins, with scale three dimensional drawings from multiple angles, I’m not sure. Given their association with Gun Control, Inc. who have time and again shown their willingness to sacrifice lives in order to further their anti-gun agenda, I haven’t been able to decide if they were trying to prevent or propagate the use of these “switches”. 

One thing is for certain though. While Glock handguns are the current focus of so-called “easily convertible” firearms to be banned, once they gain traction here, they will quickly add more handguns, then rifles, then shotguns to their ever-evolving definition of banned firearms. Just like the never-ending definition of so-called “assault weapons”, this category of too-deadly-for-civilians-to-own firearms will continue to expand and encompass more and more currently legal firearms. 

As I’ve mentioned before, all of this is being sponsored, written and supported by the extremist folks at Gun Control, Inc., funded by billionaire money and your very own tax dollars. State, county and municipal politicians don’t even have to understand what they are signing onto, only that it will all be taken care of for them and they will be considered a hero of the fanatical gun control community when the laws get enacted. 

If you’re think this will somehow make our streets safer, it won’t. Criminals, terrorists and thugs know the law and break it anyway. It’s what they do. Adding more laws for them to ignore isn’t going to stop them of doing something they think will give them an advantage over a disarmed and vulnerable victim population. 

Glock bans should be recognized for exactly what they are, another unconstitutional gun grab. None of these new laws target those who are creating and distributing the parts or the ones who use them, only the retailers who legally sell firearms and the law-abiding citizen who want to purchase, carry and use firearms for their own protection and the protection of their families.

Remember, gun control does absolutely nothing to increase public safety and the answer to fix that shortcoming is always to implement more gun control.

Bob

#Oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #2A, #GunControlFails, #NoNewGunLaws, #FactsMatter, #GunVote, #ATF, #Switch, #medium, #mewe, #gab, #gettr, #truthsocial, #threads, #bluesky, #oddstuffing.com

ATF Policy & The Winds of Change

We are seeing a great deal of change within the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives). Going the way of the Dodo are many draconian and punitive polices put in place by the extremist left gun control lobby to restrict your Second Amendment protected rights. But be warned, just because the new – in reality the previously abandoned and replaced – polices are steering the agency back on a course of partnering with the firearm industry today, doesn’t mean it’s going to stay that way. 

For those of us who were used to the ATF working with the firearm industry instead of against it, these changes are most certainly welcome. Among the changes: 

Cancellation of the so-called “Zero Tolerance” policy which automatically revoked Federal Firearm Licensees (FFLs) license for minor and inconsequential paperwork errors. 

The Demand 2 Program is ending. Otherwise known as “name and shame”, required FFLs with 25 or more firearms traced back to them following the recovery at a crime scene, and the time from retail sale to trace is three years or less, be automatically flagged for additional scrutiny, regardless of whether or not they had complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Initiated in February of 2000 during the anti-gun Clinton administration, the program implied the retailers had done something wrong, even if they followed the exact letter of the law. These confidential results from ATF firearm traces were often released to anti-gun groups for publication. 

The restrictions on non-lethal training rounds used by military, law enforcement and civilian force-on-force training scenarios and fired from “specific-use guns that can’t fire standard ammunition” have been removed. These rounds are now not considered ammunition because they are not designed for offensive combat and are not designed or for use in any firearm. 

The ban on so-called “dual use” barrels has been reversed. Dual-use barrels were banned for import in 2005, if those barrels could be used in a firearm determined to be “non-sporting.” Now, the ATF views those barrels as importable, as long as they can be used with sporting purpose guns. 

We also see the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has sent staff to the Agency with the goal of revising or eliminating more than 50 rules and gun restrictions by July 4. While a momentous task with the potential to reduce or eliminate many administrative roadblocks within the ATF, we have no indication if these will be internal operations or external Second Amendment impacting policies. 

Among the changes being considered is a reduction in the number of Industry Operations Investigator (IOIs) by two thirds, 541 of the estimated 800 currently on staff. The workforce reductions are part of the DOJ’s plan to merge the ATF and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) into one agency.

This proposed merger however is a real head scratcher. It’s unlikely you could find two more oppositely focused agencies. One primarily deals with lawful, Second Amendment protected firearms rights, the other primarily deals with unlawful, trafficking and use of illegal substances. Like many, I am dubious of this plan. 

Meanwhile, let’s consider the policy changes at the ATF. Supposedly new management and oversight brought in with the new administration is returning the agency to its role as an industry partner and investigator and enforcer of the illegal firearms market. For those of us involved in the firearms industry, this is obviously a very good thing when compared to the previous administration who fundamentally turned policy and direction of the ATF over to the gun control lobby. 

But therein lies the rub. The previous anti-gun administration turned the ATF into a gun control organization. This more pro-Second Amendment administration is returning the ATF to an industry partner/investigator of illegal activities agency. What will happen when the next anti-gun administration comes into power? 

We’ve already seen federal agencies roles mutated across the board. The FBI went from being the nation’s premier law enforcement agency to a domestic political spy agency more concerned with parents’ free speech at school board meetings than threats to national security or crime. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Air Marshals were concentrating on covertly transporting unvetted illegal aliens and monitoring anyone who spoke out against the program. Customs and Border Protection became the illegals and smugglers welcome wagon and valet service. While these agencies are supposedly being refocused to their actual roles, I don’t believe anyone is going to fully trust this will be a permanent change.

I suppose the good news is with the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) overturning the 1984 Chevron case, it will make it more difficult for federal agencies to create and interpret the law themselves. This of course assumes future administrations will follow the law and SCOTUS will uphold the eventual challenges to violations. 

Where does this leave us peasants? Skeptical at best. We need to embrace and celebrate the changes BACK to where we were before but to also prepare for the eventuality of when the wind blows in the other direction. 

Perhaps now is a good time to consider who we vote for in the 2026 midterms and STOP SENDING PEOPLE WHO WILL TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHTS TO REPRESENT US! 

Bob

#Oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #2A, #GunControlFails, #NoNewGunLaws, #FactsMatter, #GunVote, #ATF, #medium, #mewe, #gab, #gettr, #truthsocial, #threads, #bluesky, #oddstuffing.com

ATF Implements Background Checks for Alcohol Purchases (Fictitious Content

The ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) recently announced a change in their regulatory approach. With consideration to the deaths and health dangers associated with the consumption of alcohol, purchases shall henceforward require a background check. This move will synchronize the oversight and governing over the areas ATF is responsible, using firearms and explosives as the model 

ATF noted that *alcohol related deaths in the United States far outnumber the deaths in other areas they regulate. In 2022 alone, 13,524 people died in alcohol-impaired driving traffic incidents. That equals one person dead every 39 minutes. Additionally, 95,000 alcohol related deaths occur each year, along with 47,500 deaths attributable to the long-term health failure from drinking. Stricter regulations of alcohol purchases will certainly be a significant benefit to public safety. 

The Bureau also stated that many thousands of individuals around the country are under court order with pre-trial, sentencing and probation restrictions against the purchase and consumption of alcohol. This new effort will be of significant assistance to local, state and federal law enforcement for enforcement of judicial orders as well as help local retailers avoid liability by unknowing providing alcohol to prohibited persons or minors. 

The background checks will be in two forms. For on-premises consumption, an instant background check will be conducted based on a valid state driver’s license or non-driver identification card. All purchases will be recorded in the ATF database. The regulatory analogy for this type of check and tracking is renting a firearm at a range and used under the guidance/supervision of trained range personal.

For retail purchases where there will be no supervision of consumption, an instant background check and three-day waiting period will be imposed prior to the buyer being able to take possession of their alcohol purchase. The regulatory analogy for this type of check is a firearm sale at a retail establishment where the purchaser passes an instant background check but must wait three or more days before taking possession of their firearm. 

All purchases will be tracked in the new ATF Alcohol Database. The data may be accessed by any law enforcement agency and shall be prima facie evidence of the intent to purchase, possess and consume alcohol. The ATF indicated future plans to use the database to limit the quantity of purchases permissible in a given time period as well as deny purchase based on a calculation of presumed blood alcohol level from accumulated purchases based on the physical attributes on the individual’s ID card. 

An announcement on new regulations for tobacco is expected in the coming months. 

Of course, all the above information is absolutely, 100% fictious EXCEPT the astricted* section on the number of deaths associated with alcohol consumption.

Can you imagine the public reaction if the ATF were to attempt to conduct background checks and a waiting period for alcohol purchases? It would be as if the 18th Amendment was never repealed by the 21stAmendment. How DARE the government do a background check for me to have a drink or delay my purchase of legal alcohol! Unthinkable! 

From a pure public safety point of view, the number of lives lost to use of alcohol (a privilege) is far greater than the lives lost for use of firearms (a constitutionally protected right). Yet alcohol is loosely regulated, and firearms are controlled very tightly, with attempts to increase it every year at the local, state and federal level. If politicians actually wanted to save lives, wouldn’t that be the logical place to start? 

The difference of course is restricting civilian purchasing, possession and use of firearms makes the population more dependent on government agencies for their safety. A dependent population is more willing to giving up their rights for the promise of safety, even though the government has no ability, and no legal obligation, to protect them. Yet the mere ‘promise’ of safety is enough for many to give up their arms. Gun control is about people control, NOT public safety. 

Civilian firearms can and are used most commonly for legal purposes and self-defense. In a long-buried CDC (Centers for Disease Control) studies, the CDC found that civilian defensive use of firearms outnumbered felonious use of firearms by a rate of 3 to 1, to the tune of 2.5 to 3 million uses per year. Note that not all the events involved the discharge of a firearm by the civilian. Often, the mere presenting or challenge to the criminal with a firearm was enough to stop the intended crime.  It’s also important to realize this number ONLY includes persons who were not performing defensive duties as part of their employment such as law enforcement or security services.

There is of course that whole guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government thing, but that only matters if we ever envisioned a government that was out of control and tried to illegally control the population based on things like religion, politics or ideology. That would never happen, right? 

The reality is YOU and YOU ALONE are responsible for your own safety and the safety of your family, at home and in public. IF a firearm is the right tool for you to use, then accept the responsibility of ownership, safe storage for your individual situation, obtain the training you need and carry on! 

And finally, drink responsibly and do NOT drink and drive. 

Bob

#Oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #2A, #GunControlFails, #NoNewGunLaws, #FactsMatter, #ATF, #ConcealCarry, #GunVote, #medium, #mewe, #gab, #gettr, #truthsocial, #threads, #oddstuffing.com

Executive Actions, Gun Control Extremists and the ATF

Last Thursday, the Harris-Biden [sic] administration announced six gun control Executive Actions. The first five were simple requests that quite honestly could have been handled by a phone call or email. But then that wouldn’t have been as flashy as a televised Rose Garden event with the gun control crowd. The final one however, is of the most concern. The nomination of a gun control extremist / spokesperson and oath breaker to lead the federal agency responsible for the regulation of the firearm industry foreshadows what we can expect from this administration on gun control. 

The photo is of ATF Director Nominee David Chipman proudly posing for a picture in front of the still smoldering ashes of the Branch Davidian compound and the bodies of 76 American citizens, including 20 children burned alive in Waco, TX, the end result of the botched ATF raid on the compound. 

The announcement ceremony of the Executive Actions was exactly what you would expect from this administration. It included the now all-to-common unintelligible Presidential speaking gaffs as well as outright lies about the Constitution, the Second Amendment, American history, firearms laws and the impact of gun control. Yes, I said lies. Not misspeaks or things that could be interpreted in multiple ways, lies. These were statements that are factually wrong. 

All of the Executive Actions announced on Thursday are of concern for the Second Amendment community and are already attracting broad opposition across the country. However, it is the last one, the nomination of Chipman for Director of the ATF that is the most troublesome. 

Chipman is a 25-year veteran of the ATF, notably being the case agent for the Branch Davidian raid. Upon retiring from the ATF, he went on to be a senior policy advisor for Mayors Against Illegal Guns and provided training and support for gun control groups such as The Joyce Foundation, Americans for Responsible Solutions, The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Coalition to Stop Gun Violence and the Center for American Progress. He later became the senior policy advisor for the Giffords gun control group.  

Chipman, who describes himself as “proud and responsible gun owner” says “I am also permitted to carry a concealed handgun.” Please note his use of the word “permitted” here vs. ‘I have a right to carry a firearm.’ Allowing only a select, chosen few to carry a firearm outside their homes is a common goal of gun control extremists like Chipman. It is also important to realize that as a retired law enforcement officer, Chipman has a 50-state concealed carry permit granted to him through the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA). Yet national concealed carry permit reciprocity is denied the average American citizen. 

Then there are the lies. Chipman lied when he said “At Waco, cult members used 2 .50 caliber Barretts to shoot down two Texas Air National Guard helicopters. Point, it is true we are fortunate they are not used in crime more often.” The record is clear on this. No helicopters were shot down. 

Chipman lied when he testified before Congress and claimed that the American gun market was “flooded” with “foreign made ARs.” Nearly all AR pattern rifles are American made, something a seasoned ATF veteran would know.

Chipman falsely testified that the reason why NFA (National Firearm Act) weapons are seldom used in crimes is because there is a background check with photos and fingerprints taken, along with a $200 tax. The real reason NFA firearms and accessories are not used in crimes is they range from rather to extraordinarily expensive and are owned by law-abiding citizens. Criminals, who possess and use the EXACT SAME type of firearms and accessories in crimes DO NOT register them with the NFA. 

While referring to so-called “assault weapons”, Chipman testified “I believe we should ban the future production and sale to civilians and afford current owners of these firearms the ability to license these particular guns with ATF under the National Firearms Act.” He is quoted as saying “What I support is treating them just like machine guns.” 

Now consider the current push for universal background checks which is touted as being the ONLY way to keep guns out of the hand of criminals. Keep in mind all commercially made firearms must be initially purchased through a federally licensed firearms dealer WITH a background check. But if that background check is insufficient to prevent them from being used in crimes like NFA firearms, then how long will it be before ALL firearm ownership and purchases will be subjected to NFA requirements including the registration, transfer and transport restrictions and tax? 

Chipman has falsely described firearm suppressors as “The gun does not sound gun-like. It takes the edge out of the tone . . . This is how I would describe it: It makes a gun sort of sound like a nail gun.”  In reality, the 30-35 dBA difference between a nail gun and a suppressed pistol will be perceived as at least eight times louder to the human ear. 

David Chipman is a prime example of the type of “proud and responsible gun owner” gun control organizations love. He is willing to turn his back on his oath and use his reputation to restrict and eliminate the very same type of firearms he owns, uses and surrounds himself with for his protection, all in the finest tradition of the gun control elite. 

Finally, handing over the reins of a government agency to a paid gun control extremist who has not only endorsed but participated in the heavy-handed enforcement efforts the ATF has regrettably become infamous for should be a signal for all law-abiding firearm owners of what we can expect from the Harris-Biden administration beyond these “initial” gun control measures. 

Bob

#oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #NFA, #AssaultWeapons, #ATF, #GunControlFails, #mewe, #medium, #parler, #oddstuffing.com

UPDATE: BATFE is the new CA DOJ BOF

On December 23, 2020, the ATF withdrew the “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with “Stabilizing Braces”. The document and call for comments originally published on December 18th gathered more that 60K comments, and according to antidotal evidence, the VAST majority of the responses opposed the proposed regulation. The link to the notice is below. 

While many in the firearms / Second Amendment community are considering this a victory, we all know this will return. Instead of a victory triggered by our comments, it is very likely the posting, comments and withdrawal were part of the original plan to get input on where the proposed regulation would be attacked to help make it stronger. 

Think of it as beta software released into the user community to assess and locate its vulnerabilities. Improvements can then be made based on the feedback to make it better, stronger and more bulletproof. 

If we have learned anything about the gun control zealots prior work at the CA DOJ BOF, it’s that they are persistent. Rejection, be it by governmental regulators, the courts, the firearm industry or the public mean nothing to them. They will be back with a bigger, badder version of the exact same thing, and with a plan to push it through no matter what. 

The fight is not over yet. 

Bob

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/general-notice/sb-criteria-withdrawal-notice-12-23-20pdf/download

#oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #stablizingbrace, #80% #assaultweapon, #ATF, #NFA, #GunControlFails, #mewe, #medium, #parler, #oddstuffing.com

BATFE is the new CA DOJ BOF

Let’s face it, there aren’t a whole lot of people who love the BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or simply ATF). In the world of federal enforcement agencies, they’ve never been high on the ‘warm and fuzzy’ scale. Then along comes their recent moves against companies who make 80% firearms and suppressor kits, and now pistol braces. Let’s not forget their previous administrative actions to ban bump stocks and you have an agency most would now put into the ‘hated’ category. For those of you who think it can’t get any worse, just ask any firearm owner in California how their own DOJ BOF (Department of Justice, Bureau of Firearms) evolved. The same thing, using the same tactics, is now occurring at the ATF. A coincidence? Hardly… 

We all know the incident that caused bump stocks to become illegal in this country. A horrible tragedy with no known motive or individual to take responsibility, so bump stocks were blamed and banned. Not an unprecedented move in the gun control world, but it highlighted the ability of the ATF to reverse previous determinations based on political pressure. What we are seeing now is the same thing. 

The ATF recently served warrants, or raided, depending on how you look at it, an 80% firearms manufacturer. The target was a packaged kit of supplies to manufacture your own firearm, as well as the people who had purchased them. Note that all these individual parts are available from this and numerous other manufacturers and can be purchased separately or even purchased at the same time, but it was the “kit” that caused the ATF to act. The logic is the “kit” can be used to put together a firearm in minutes (which is absolutely not true unless you count your hours in minutes) and as such, should be considered a firearm. Somewhere in the noise it appears a “kit” had been purchased by a prohibited person to build a firearm, which would be illegal for them to possess. 

Among the no surprise things going on here are that a prohibited person is going to acquire a firearm, something ILLEGAL for them to do, or that the ATF might consider a “kit” a firearm. As little as two years ago another manufacturer received a ruling from the ATF that while the 80% frame was not a firearm, “This classification does not apply if the polymer frame-blank is marketed, sold, or distributed as part of a kit.” We can debate the lack of logic behind this, but it is there in black and white. It seems the 80% industry isn’t very good about sharing knowledge.  

Not only was the 80% firearm manufacturer subject to an ATF search and seizure, but also an 80% suppressor manufacturer, and apparently for similar reasons. It also appears the ATF is now visiting customers of these products demanding “voluntary” forfeiture to avoid them securing a search warrant to seize the property. That last part is a whole different argument for another time. 

And now, we have the ATF putting out a notice and request for comment entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with “Stabilizing Braces””. The link to the notice and where you can make a comment is listed below. It’s only five pages long and I highly recommend you read it for yourself. 

In short, the document fails at the first word, objective. Instead, it is highly subjective and lacks the critical details that would allow a manufacturer or consumer to make an informed decision about the legality of a product they produce or possess. Instead, a firearm is “subject to the NFA (National Firearms Act), on a case-by-case basis.”

It highlights considerations like type and caliber, weight and length, length of pull, aim point and sights and scopes as items to be evaluated, but provides absolutely no details on what is and isn’t acceptable under the proposed rules. The very subjectivity of it could lead the same firearm owned by one person to be considered legal but subject to NFA rules if owned by another person. 

If you’re wondering where this is heading, the document outlines the options you’ll have for a stabilizing brace firearm. They are “registering the firearm in compliance with the NFA” “permanently removing the stabilizing brace from the firearm and disposing of it, replacing the barrel of the firearm (16’’ or greater for a rifle, or 18’’ or greater for a shotgun), surrendering the firearm to ATF, or destroying the firearm.” Note the carrot for registering your firearm under the NFA is a waiver of the $200 / firearm fee. 

So why are Californians having a case of déjà vu? Because the CA DOJ BOF has used very similar tactics in their war on so-called “assault weapons”. This includes the use of “emergency” regulations that dramatically reduce the amount of time comments are taken. In this case, instead of the usual, regulatory mandated 30 days, the ATF has limited the amount of time to just 17 days, over the Christmas and New Year’s holidays, another one of CA DOJ BOF’s tactics. 

Some are saying this is a blessing since it will allow people to register their firearms as a SBR (short barreled rifle) without having to pay the $200 tax stamp. This of course ignores the obvious issue of having to register in the first place, as well as having to register a pistol as a SBR. There are also a host of other restrictions that come with NFA firearms. And if you’re going to have to register your stabilizing brace firearm as an SBR, why not put on an actual firearm stock instead of something that doesn’t work well as a stock?

The CA DOJ BOF may provide us with some insight here. During the last round of “assault weapon” laws, Californians could register their so-called “bullet button assault weapons” but were not allowed to remove the bullet buttons to be like the other “registered assault weapons”. Registration also meant they could not sell or pass on their firearm to heirs. 

Looking into the Odd Stuffing crystal ball, I’m seeing many changes coming to the NFA, including a separate category for stabilizing brace firearms that will preclude their ability to be altered, transferred or inherited in the future. I’m also seeing a lot of so-called “semi-automatic assault weapons” being added to the NFA as well. Although that’s not really a crystal ball thing since the probable incoming administration has vowed to place “assault weapons” under the jurisdiction of the NFA. 

What we are seeing is the first steps towards making the ATF like the CA DOJ BOF. This strategy to get more and more firearms registered though through the NFA will only make their eventual outlaw, confiscation and destruction on a nationwide basis easier in the future. Can you guess where this idea came from?

This is just another step to administratively diminish the protections of the Second Amendment into nonexistence, just like they’ve already done in California. 

Bob

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/18/2020-27857/objective-factors-for-classifying-weapons-with-stabilizing-braces

#oddstuffing, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #SecondAmendment, #stablizingbrace, #80% #assaultweapon, #ATF, #NFA, #GunControlFails, #mewe, #medium, #parler, #oddstuffing.com